On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:58:14AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Steve M. Robbins <st...@sumost.ca>, 2010-07-25, 21:25: > >severity 588903 normal > >thanks > > Could you explain why did you lower severity of this bug?
It didn't seem to me to fit the definition of "serious":
serious
is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a
"must" or "required" directive), or, in the package maintainer's
or release manager's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for
release.
(from http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer)
It's a bug, but not a violation of any policy that I can think of.
I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise. What makes it "serious"
in your eyes?
Regards,
-Steve
P.S. Can you help me debug the build failure? It only failed on that
one architecture, "armel". The same code (version 3.18.0-2) built on
armel in May.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
