retitle 565762 firebird2.5: please port to alpha tags 565762 upstream severity 565762 wishlist thanks
-=| Kurt Roeckx, Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 06:35:18PM +0100 |=- > > g++ -ggdb -O3 -DNDEBUG -DLINUX -pipe -MMD -fPIC > > -DFB_SEND_FLAGS=MSG_NOSIGNAL -I../src/include/gen -I../src/include > > -I../src/vulcan -DNAMESPACE=Vulcan -pthread -g -O2 -DBOOT_BUILD > > -fno-rtti -c ../src/jrd/inf.cpp -o ../temp/boot/jrd/inf.o > > ../src/jrd/inf.cpp: In function 'void INF_database_info(const UCHAR*, > > SSHORT, UCHAR*, SSHORT)': > > ../src/jrd/inf.cpp:387: error: 'IMPLEMENTATION' was not declared in this > > scope > > make[4]: *** [../temp/boot/jrd/inf.o] Error 1 > > make[3]: *** [boot_phase1_build.stamp] Error 2 > > make[2]: *** [../gen/firebird/bin/gpre_static] Error 2 > > make[1]: *** [firebird] Error 2 > > make: *** [build-super-stamp] Error 2 > > A full build log can be found at: > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=alpha&pkg=firebird2.5&ver=2.5.0.25784~ReleaseCandidate1.ds2-4 Yup. Firebird 2.5 is not yet ported to alpha. Prior to version 3.0 (in alpha stages) Firebird requires a special, unique define for each OS+hardware platform it runs on. Providing that is not hard, but must be synchronized with upstream and I am not sure if they want new ports in their 2.5 line. I'll contact them.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
