On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 06:38:41AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 05:10:26PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > O: Selecting previously deselected package mawk. > > O: dpkg: regarding .../mawk_1.3.3-15ubuntu2_amd64.deb containing mawk, > > pre-dependency problem: > > O: mawk pre-depends on libc6 (>= 2.11~20100104-0ubuntu3) > > O: libc6 is unpacked, but has never been configured. > > O: dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem! > > O: Unpacking mawk (from .../mawk_1.3.3-15ubuntu2_amd64.deb) ... > > P: Unpacking package mawk > > D: Updating mawk to status 2 > > O: Selecting previously deselected package base-files. > > O: dpkg: regarding .../base-files_5.0.0ubuntu20_amd64.deb containing > > base-files, pre-dependency problem: > > O: base-files pre-depends on awk > > O: mawk provides awk but is unpacked but not configured. > > O: dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem! > > O: Unpacking base-files (from .../base-files_5.0.0ubuntu20_amd64.deb) ... > > P: Unpacking package base-files > > D: Updating base-files to status 2 > Only because it's a cdebootstrap bug. Unless you see something that causes > initramfs-tools to be pulled into the essential set (which I do not), this > is a cdebootstrap bug for not fulfilling the pre-depends of the essential > packages before continuing.
You should know better, awk is not essential. Also essential means that it have to work _without_ being configured. Bastian -- Men will always be men -- no matter where they are. -- Harry Mudd, "Mudd's Women", stardate 1329.8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org