Hi, Scott Howard <showard...@gmail.com> writes:
> What were your plans for the two branches? Were you thinking of > maintaining both until everyone moves away from 1.2? In that case we > can add version 1.3.0 and update 1.2.1 to 1.2.2. I hoped that nobody would start using 1.3.x until Squeeze was released and then get everything to switch for Squeeze+1. Do you plan to include packages depending on 1.3.x in Squeeze? Without having looked at the 1.3 in detail yet, there seems to be at least the problem that both 1.2 and 1.3 provide libenet.so. In case we need to maintain both at the same time, the -dev packages would not be co-installable. It might also reuse one of the sonames that Debian used before we included "debian" in the soname. With regards to 1.2.2: At least the entry "now uses packed attribute for protocol structures on platforms with strange alignment rules" sounds useful, but it seems to also introduce ABI and a small API change (see "Caveats" in the changelog). Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
