severity 323099 serious thanks Hi,
* Noèl Köthe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050815 00:08]: > Am Sonntag, den 14.08.2005, 20:13 +0200 schrieb Ulf Harnhammar: > > both wget's man page and its info documentation are licensed under GFDL 1.2 > > or later. According to debian-legal, GFDL doesn't conform to the DFSG, so > > these > > files must be removed from main. > Yes. this is sadly correct. > I discussed this with the Brandon at Debconf. Until there is no official > Debian statement to this license I cannot argue/discuss this problem > with upstream. I have the same problem like you in your bug report. The > concrete statement is missing and until then nothing has to be done. > Until there is no statement its not RC. Actually, it is obvious that the current GFDL is non-free. Of course, the these issues are "only" bugs in the way the license is written (unless the text contains front-/covertexts or otherwise unmodificable sections), but it still renders the GFDL non-free. I can understand if you wait for the next GFDL version (and we all hope that it will finally be free), but that doesn't make the bug non-serious. (And of course, squashing GFDL-bugs is not very high on my priority list at the current point in time.) Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
