Hi, On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 08:02:43AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > + If the maintainer of a package no longer has time or desire to > > > + maintain a package, it will be orphaned according to the > > > + procedure described in the Debian Developer's Reference > > > + (see <ref id="related">). The maintainer then > > > "It will" makes it sound like that the former maintainer has nothing to > > do. "It should" would be more appropriate IMO. > > But "should" is a magic, normative verb in policy, so I avoided using it > here even though it's the natural choice... :)
s/it will be orphaned/he shall orphan it/ Better ? Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Follow the Debian Revolution ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
