* Sandro Tosi (mo...@debian.org) [100706 00:24]: > Ok, probably I didn't express myself clearly enough. you are talking > about the future, when python will have co-maintainers > (python*-default already has them), am I correct? I was referring > instead to the current situation where python*-default has > co-maintainers while python interpreter packages still has not. It > seems to me that Matthias is still the key to make the architecture > works, since he controls interpreters and co-control (horrible > expression) the *-default, so without his ack (and so public > discussion when needed) we are stuck.
Just checking: if pythonX.Y would have appropriate co-maintainers, you then would be happy? Or is there more to be done as of today? Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
