On 28/06/10 07:05, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Ulises Vitulli <der...@debian.org> [2010-06-27 13:52]:
>   
>> On 27/06/10 08:30, Ulises Vitulli wrote:
>>     
>>>> Hi,
>>>> short update... this doesn't seem to be the case if I change 
>>>> edge = top to edge = bottom. Unfortunately I want my panel 
>>>> at the top edge.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> I'm afraid I can't reproduce that on Fluxbox, then I tend to think It
>>> has something to do more than with Openbox than with fbpanel itself.
>>>
>>> Just to avoid any kind of misunderstanding from the bugreport, can you
>>> try that on Fluxbox to see if you experiment the same issue as with Openbox
>>>       
>> Just one thing more, can you try running fbpanel -C and activating "Set
>> Stacking Layer" to your desired choice and see if it helps ?
>>     
> This setting doesn't change anything for me but in fluxbox it works as 
> expected. Mind to test this with openbox as well in case this is related to 
> my 
> openbox configuration?
>   
Ok, just as I thought.
> Still confused what changed as only fbpanel was updated. You've got an 
> overview of what change code-wise?
>   
Sorry, I express myself wrong. I meant to say that I think it's an issue
linked to Openbox from fbpanel.

Let me forward this to upstream to see if he can provide some solution
about it.



Greetings,

Dererk

-- 
BOFH excuse #8:
static buildup


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to