> of package updated compared to the version I have. So there must be > something corrupted in the way the package list is updated or in > apt itself
Sorry, completely my fault. I changed the signature of the method used to get the candidate version of a package slightly, but i forgot that the method is virtual, so depending on where the method is called it uses either the right (as before) or a fallback method which is good enough in other cases but not in that one (a bit more complicated then that, but that should be the essence). The fallback causes that e.g. the -t option has no effect, but you should be able to use the explicit requests like package/release and package=version. Again, sorry & will be fixed in the next upload… … and while healing my wounds from your hard punishments for this silliness, i will hope for the next c++ standard [0]. ;) Best regards, David Kalnischkies [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x#Explicit_virtual_function_overrides -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
