On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 07:10:27PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Harald Jenny wrote: > > >>I am not sure what you mean. If you use a conn with an invalid leftcert= and > >>it does not work, what exactly is the bug? > > > >That it worked in 2.4 and not in 2.6 ;-) > > I'm still unsure of that until proven :P
Well what prove do you want? I have tested it yesterday night... > > >(what the bugreport said) - the leftid gets ignored in 2.6 which is a change > >in behaviour. Maybe it would be more beneficial to decline to add a > >connection with a non-existant certificate file in the first place? > > But if they load the conn, then copy in the certificate, it can work. I think > the current behaviour is fine. When needed and missing, complain. Sorry Paul but I don't think the currect behaviour is correct - there is no indication for the user why *id is ignored and this is not good :-(. > > Paul Harald -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
