tag 545481 unreproducible moreinfo thanks Hi Joey,
On Monday 07 September 2009 18:10:36 Joey Hess wrote: > Peter Pentchev wrote: > > Oh... I think I see it now - it's just that it's an information notice, > > not a warning or an error. In that case, it might be that it's your > > call to decide to ignore it - and if so, sorry for the wasted time > > again, and thanks for your response! Should I close the bug, or will > > you? > > I don't understand why lintian emits even an I: for this. Policy does > not seems to require splititng B-D in this case; there is no value in > doing do; it is difficult and faulure-prone to do so; it can apparently > require lintian overrides to get the split right, as we see in your > patch. I can't reproduce it with the current version of lintian and I couldn't find anything relevant in the changelog either. Could you please shed more light and, if possible, provide a package that demonstrates the bug? Thanks Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
