On 26/06/2010 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:02 +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > > I'm not really sure what's the intended boot-sequence but I personally > > think the legacy one makes more sense than the new dependency-based one > > (ymmv). > The problem is, there is not "intended" way of doing it,... many users > may prefer totally different ways of stacking there layers... and you > may have even more (nbd, losetup, etc.) and the same ones multiple > times... > > I'm currently looking into these problems,.. but I guess there is no > easy way... > AFAIK Jonas is also looking for a way to generically solve this,.... but > all the other packages (lvm2, mdadm) are in principle also affected... > > > But I also think, that we should keep for compatibility the older order.
agreed, next upload will restore old order. greetings, jonas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
