On 06/25/2010 11:49 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:51:05PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> are there any news on this bug? I've been hit by it today again, which is >> really >> anoying as I have to build and use atlas now instead of the small libblas as >> it >> is not possible for me to build-conflict on A and build-depend on B in this >> case. > > I'm not sure what you're trying to do here. If you think it > should get build with A on the buildds, you should use A | B. > If you think B should be used, you should use B | A. > > This makes sure that you actually get reproducible behaviour and > that the buildd doesn't pick A or B randomly.
No, you understood me wrong. I build-depend on liblapack-dev, which depends on libatlas-base-dev | libblas-dev | libblas-3gf.so But I want to avoid to build with libatlas-base-dev as libblas-dev is more than enough in this case (and I need to build-depend on it anyway). So it should be safe to build-conflict against libatlas-base-dev as all dependencies are solved - this works well in pbuilder, but sbuild still fails to solve that. Hope that explains it better. Bernd -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79 ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
