---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Erskine <mse...@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Rxtx] gnu.io.RXTXPort discards exception silently if
initialization fails
To: "r...@qbang.org" <r...@qbang.org>
On 23 June 2010 06:38, Kustaa Nyholm <kustaa.nyh...@planmeca.com> wrote:
>
>> I did change the code to
>> try {
>> z = new Zystem();
>> } catch ( Exception e ) {
>> throw new Error(e.toString());
>> };
>
> Is there a reason why this could/should not be:
>
>
>> try {
>> z = new Zystem();
>> } catch ( Throwable e ) {
>> e.printStackTrace(System.err);
>> };
Or even just let the exception bubble up and kill whatever thread
caused the class to load :)
I vote for the removal of Zystem BTW!
Regards,
Michael Erskine.
_______________________________________________
Rxtx mailing list
r...@qbang.org
http://mailman.qbang.org/mailman/listinfo/rxtx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
