Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> I wrote:
>> Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Bug#562945: Bug#582755: Bug#562945: fails to
>> install"):
>>> In summary, my proposal would be to:
>>> - decline to override the runit-run maintainer, whose use of debconf is
>>> discouraged but /not/ forbidden by Policy
>>> - advise the Policy maintainers to proceed with the existing proposed
>>> language regarding high-priority prompts
>>> - refer the question of overall releasability of runit-run to the Release
>>> Team
>> I agree. I see that in #224509 Russ writes that the new wording has
>> been merged for the next release.
> Just for the avoidance of doubt, we need to say clearly that we agree
> with the submitters of #562945 and #574223 that the current behaviour of
> runinit is a bug. So the bug should remain open and be reassigned to
> runinit.
> We are not ruling on whether the bug is release criticial, and that
> question is part of what the Release Team will have to decide.
Yup, I agree.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
