Hi Sam,

Looking at this bug as part of a BSP this weekend :)

I understand where you're coming from regarding the inconvenience to users
with local packages that they'll have to rebuild them when upgrading from
lenny to squeeze.  However, between any two stable releases of Debian there
are always a large number of library transitions of this nature so I don't
think it will be surprising to users that this is the case for libkrb53.
Furthermore, as others have already commented, it's more important to ensure
that you can't shoot yourself in the foot with the package manager than to
ensure that some binary packages don't have to be rebuilt on upgrades.

You may be interested to know that Policy is being updated with a patch to
address precisely this kind of case (Replaces w/o Breaks), via bug #578854.
Perhaps you'll find a better solution to this specific upgrade problem that
satisfies all the various requirements; but in the meantime, I think it's
better to just add the Breaks.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to