On Mon, 07 Jun 2010, Christian Kastner wrote:
> > I doubt there would be ever two versions of libfann*-dev available, and
> > it isn't a project with fast changing API ;)
> Upstream Makefile.{am,in} contain references to the libfann2-dev
> package. They don't affect our build process in any way, so they could
> be safely changed.
yeah -- those seems to be only for composing source distributions by
upstream
> I'd prefer libfann-dev too, but didn't want to deviate from upstream too
> much. If you think it's safe to change, I'll do it.
should be safe, but ideally I would have made a tiny patch on top of
Makefile.*, include it in debian/patches, ship it upstream and check
what he would think about it -- may be he had some higher visions? but
that might take awhile to get a reply, so to expedite I don't mind
leaving it as is... and thus up to your decision.
> The changes were applied to git, I'll wait with rebuilding/uploading
> the source package for your opinion on libfann?-dev.
make your own decision, and gimme url to .dsc -- I think we could
try getting through NEW (since there was libfann1-dev, I guess
ftpmasters shouldn't complaint much about libsvm2-dev).
--
.-.
=------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------=
Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192
Linux User ^^-^^ [175555]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
