Hi Michael, thanks for the detailed information. It helps to figure out what is going wrong.
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 08:52 -0400, Michael Hanke wrote: > My system's current state is compliant with this: > > mich...@meiner ~ % apt-cache policy vtk-tcl > vtk-tcl: > Installed: 5.2.1-11 > Candidate: 5.4.2-7 > Version table: > 5.4.2-7 0 > 500 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu sid/main Packages > 5.4.2-6 0 > 500 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu squeeze/main Packages > *** 5.2.1-11 0 > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 5.0.4-1.1 0 > 500 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu lenny/main Packages > The current version of vtk-tcl for testing is 5.4.2-6 . You are using an old version of this package. Is there a reason why you stick with the old version 5.2.1-11? > Slicer should probably make use of a versioned dependency on vtk-tcl. Yes, that is one of the reason why I kept this bug report open. The other thing I was thinking about is to change the name of vtk-tcl according to the Debian Tcl/Tk policy [0] to tcl8.5-vtk . Cheers Dominique [0] http://pkg-tcltk.alioth.debian.org/tcltk-policy.html/ch-module_packages.html#s-dependencies -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
