This one time, at band camp, Rainer Zocholl said: > Package: libclamav1 > Version: 0.86.2-3 > Priority: optional > Section: libs > Maintainer: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Uncompressed Size: 483k > Depends: libbz2-1.0, libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1), libcurl3 (>= 7.13.1-1), libgmp3c2 | > libgmp3, libidn11 (>= 0.5.18), libssl0.9.7, zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1) > Conflicts: libclamav > Provides: libclamav > > > current upgrade fails: > > msi:~# aptitude install libclamav1 > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree > Reading extended state information > Initializing package states... Done > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed > E: Unable to resolve some dependencies! > Some packages had unmet dependencies. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libclamav1: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1) but 2.3.2.ds1-22 is installed. > Depends: libidn11 (>= 0.5.18) but 0.5.13-1.0 is installed. > > > The emissing packeages are not available.
Of course they are: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/base/libc6 http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libs/libidn11 It sounds to me like you have testing or stable in your sources.list, but have grabbed clamav from unstable. Is this correct? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
