Op zaterdag 29-05-2010 om 15:25 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > On 29/05/10 13:59, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote: > > My only point was that evolution-exchange should not be a hard > > dependency for Evolution, since it isn't. > Right, it isn't: > Package: evolution > [...] > Suggests: bug-buddy, gnupg, network-manager, evolution-exchange, > evolution-dbg, > evolution-plugins-experimental
That's right for the Evolution package itself, but is *is* a hard
dependency for the "gnome" metapackage, used to install a Gnome desktop
onto a machine:
Package: gnome
Depends: [...] evolution-exchange (>= 2.30) [...]
That's why I suggested lifting it to Suggests here as well in my
original report.
— Wouter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
