On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 11:32 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 30/04/10 05:35, Richard Laager wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 18:52 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> I wonder where you did this, since I found no upstream bug report. I've > >> created > >> one now. We want to remove libgnomeprint soon, so maybe we should just > >> remove > >> gbonds from the archive (its popcon is just 27). > > > > I'd rather not. It can't be that hard for me to patch gbonds to rip out > > libgnomeprint (and thus printing support) if nothing else. I'll prep a > > new package that does this in a few days. > > How's that going? We really want to remove libgnomeprint from the archive.
I've gotten a bit delayed. I'll work on this tonight for sure. For now, like I said, I'll just disable the printing support so you can remove libgnomeprint. So, I'd say I'll have something ready probably Wednesday or Thursday. I'm not a DD, so I'll need the upload sponsored. I've CC'ed my sponsor for previous uploads. Richard
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
