Hello, On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 02:02:55PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > CC'ing the person who sent the mail that made me notice (not that it's > their fault, but I figure they may want to know that they are generating > wrong headers).
Thanks for pointing this out. I had a quick look (well, muttrc(5) is
quite large) but could not find how to rectify this. I assume that the
boundary fields are somehow derived from the environment? I'd like to
send correct e-mails and it would be great if you could point me how
to work around this until a proper patch is included in mutt (probably
not before Squeeze, I assume).
Thanks!
Greetings
Helge
P.S. I CC:'ed -submitter in the hope that the extra hop at
bugs.debian.org "fixes" this problem and does not end up in the
automatic filter which caused the detection.
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
