On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 19:58 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:33:27AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 19:24 -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > > > Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-486 > > > Version: 2.6.26-19lenny2 > > > Severity: critical > > > Justification: breaks the whole system > > > > > > After upgrading linux-image-2.6.26-2-486 from 17lenny1 to 19lenny2, I > > > started experiencing 100% reproducable system lockups on a VIA C7 > > > system. No errors in the logs, no oops, no BUG, nothing - just a hard > > > lock. No keyboard LED response and no sysrq functionality worked. > > > > > > Sometimes the system wouldn't complete the boot process without > > > freezing. Sometimes it would last three minutes or so before > > > freezing. I could reproduce the lockup with "cat /dev/zero > file". > > > Every time, within 10 seconds, the system would freeze. > > > > > > After a lot of trial, error, and searching, I discovered that the > > > e_powersaver module was being loaded and the lockups went away if I > > > unloaded it. > > > > It is cpufrequtils, not the kernel, that selects which cpufreq driver to > > load, so I will assign this bug to cpufrequtils. > > > > However, we will reconsider whether this module should be built at all. > > X86_E_POWERSAVER is still built as a module in sid. Although the cpufrequtils > blacklist is present in Squeeze, we should probably drop it? After all it's > explicitly marked as dangerous in KConfig.
Yes, I've now done that. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
