http://lists.laiskiainen.org/pipermail/apt-rpm-laiskiainen.org/2010-May/thread.html, raises serious questions about the upstream version apt-rpm. I just tried to help with an RC bug. I don't use it myself. I think that actual users of apt-rpm.deb should comment.
http://lists.laiskiainen.org/pipermail/apt-rpm-laiskiainen.org/2010-May/000916.html has a suggestion on building from git HEAD. I think that substituting int_32 with int32_t in ../apt-pkg/rpm/rpmhandler.{cc,h} will partially solve the building difficulty with the current source. There is no need to make that substitution in ../include/apt-pkg/rpmhandler.h, because that file is copied during the build from ../apt-pkg/rpm/rpmhandler.h. It could be that similar patches can make the current Debian source build-able. As I wrote, I don't know how useful the resulting package will be. _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
