Jiří Paleček wrote: > I'm not really sure if the "+" has to be there, but if debconf never > required (or allowed) "+" in the beginning of debconf.conf line, it > probably shouldn't.
It's never been allowed. The vaguaries of fields(3perl) may have caused unsupported fields to be silently ignored in the past. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
