block 581888 by 532763 thanks Hi,
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:07:12AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > It has only one reverse dependency, fusedav. That as well an outdated > and incomplete package. Incomplete in what respect? I do not consider software incomplete just because of their (low) version number. > Its last upload was almost three years ago and still stuck at version > 0.2 . It should be removed as well I (the maintainer of the Debian package) do not agree with that. The last upstream version was released three years ago and I did not have much reason to upload a new revision. I've got a patch ready to port fusedav to a newer version of neon [1]. I asked upstream for a comment about that and inclusion in his tree, but I did not get an answer so far and then lost track of it (it worked for me and so there was no reason to change that -- so far). I will upload a new version shortly which will include this patch. Also, please note that fusedav currently has a popcon of 339. This is not a lot but still, imho, it's not completely insignificant. > davfs2 package is much more robust and recent while maintained > correctly. This packages does look more promising and it might make sense to migrate to in the long run. Anyway, I don't see a reason for a hard transition. Possibly, fusedav could print a message telling the user that it has been deprecated and pointing to davfs2. I'm gonna talk to the upstream maintainer about that. Cheers, Sebastian [1] see <http://git.tokkee.org/?p=fusedav.git;h=b65859f> -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
