On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:48:30AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 04:54:52PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > > It turns out the lintian lab is accessible at lintian.d.o but doesn't > > have unpacked source packages. > > > > So I did it myself and grepped through 3394 unpacked source packages > > (those that build depend on perl, or produce binary packages that depend, > > recommend, or suggest perl). > > > > Results of grepping for "use module" and "require module" follow. I've put > > the raw data available at > > http://people.debian.org/~ntyni/perl/deprecated-modules.txt.gz > > in case someone wants to conduct a more comprehensive search. > > > > I had a quick look through these and removed a few false positives, > > but there may still be some left. > > [snip results] > > > Preliminary conclusion: we're going to need at least three of the four > > modules packaged, and I'm inclined to throw in Pod::Plainer as well > > for the sake of completeness although nothing in Debian uses it. > > Yep, makes sense.
All four are now in or on their way to NEW. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
