On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Michael Banck <mba...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:39:31AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: >> I can reproduce this, just lost the db again after a kernel panic. >> Personally, I would say having a persistent db across system issues is >> pretty important for this kind of daemon, e.g. I'd like to have >> statistics about which kernel has which uptime. > > Maybe the default interval of writing the file once per minute is too > excessive; AFAICT the code which writes the records does not run any
It is. The default is now 600s (or 10mn) > This should be coded much more robustely for something which tracks > uptimes. Feel free to submit a patch... HTH -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
