Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> See disussions in bug #563118 . It is obvioous and evident, that in
> order to solve that bug some new utility is needed. Let's call it
> "sortdu". At least it is good working title.

I'm rejecting the idea of adding a sortdu to moreutils. The point of
moreutils is to gather new tools in the spirit of the original unix
tools. Writing a new program because sort and du -h don't mix w/o loss
of accuracy is not in that spirit.

There's nothing really wrong with the shell pipelines shown in #563118, 
aside from them being a bit complex. That complexity could be reduced if
du had a way to format its output like this:

412 412K .

Then the pipeline becomes just 

du --format="%i %h %f" | sort -n | awk '{print $2, $3}'

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to