On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 11:52:21AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > I think I prefer B - it should make the transition less painful in the > long run.
That one is also fine by me. > We should also try and file bugs against packages using these modules, > if we can, once the separate packages are available. Grep results so far on my rebuild logs of 1800 or so packages show nothing for Shell and Pod::Plainer, and just Switch libhtml-mason-perl_1.44-1 Class::ISA libcgi-application-extra-plugin-bundle-perl_0.1 libcgi-application-perl_4.31-1 libclass-insideout-perl_1.10-1 libclass-meta-perl_0.63-1 libclass-virtual-perl_0.06-2 libdata-treedumper-perl_0.37-1 libemail-abstract-perl_3.001-1 libmasonx-interp-withcallbacks-perl_1.18-1 libparams-callbackrequest-perl_1.19-1 libtemplate-declare-perl_0.43-1 so this doesn't look like a huge issue. -- Niko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
