On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:47:13PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:28:54PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > Thanks for the idea. I think that debuild is self-explanatory enough > not to need usage for the standard cases (see comments on your patch > below), but I have added comments on sponsored uploads to the manpage > (at least in SVN).
Thanks, that's great! > > + # Build a package normally > > + tar zcf package_1.0.orig.tar.gz package-1.0 > > + cd package-1.0 > > + debuild > Erm, that looks really ill: surely the debian/ directory should not be > in the orig.tar.gz? You are right, my fault. I tend to do that, as I'm both upstream and debian developer of some projects; however, I do agree that it's normally not the task of a DD to create the .orig.tar.gz. > > + # Build a debian native package > > + cd package-1.0 > > + debuild > Should be obvious from the rest of the manpage. Adding a comment > anyway. It's not a bad idea to start the examples with the obvious usage; however I don't mind if you don't want it. > > + # Build a sponsored package > > + cd package-1.0 > > + debuild -k"the DD's gpg key ID" > > +.fi > Equivalent comment added. Thanks again. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
