Package: osmo Version: 0.2.10-1 Severity: normal Hey,
I just noticed that osmo now required gtkhtml2. Is it really a good idea to depend on an package unmaintained upstream since 2 years? I'm not sure of the status in Debian, but I guess we should better start thinking how to get rid of the dependencies in other packages, better than add it. You might want to talk to upstream about that, maybe they could switch to gtkhtml3 or something? Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages osmo depends on: ii libc6 2.10.2-7 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcairo2 1.8.10-4 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libglib2.0-0 2.24.0-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgringotts2 1.2.10~pre3-1 gringotts data encapsulation and e ii libgtk2.0-0 2.20.0-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkspell0 2.0.16-1 a spell-checking addon for GTK's T ii libical0 0.44-3 iCalendar library implementation i ii libnotify1 [libnotif 0.4.5-1 sends desktop notifications to a n ii libpango1.0-0 1.28.0-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libxml2 2.7.7.dfsg-2 GNOME XML library ii xdg-utils 1.0.2+cvs20100307-1 desktop integration utilities from osmo recommends no packages. osmo suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
