tags 535996 + patch thanks On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 07:02:50PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > intrigeri wrote (06 Mar 2010 14:54:57 GMT) : > > Before we apply such a patch upstream, this feature must be > > implemented as a opt-in option, as it greatly changes the dup > > handler behavior. > > Now that I stand corrected wrt. the growing local cache issue, I agree > that --full-if-older-than should be enabled by default when the > installed duplicity is at least 0.6.01. > > Opting-out from the new --full-if-older-than default must be possible: > some people bootstrap huge backups on a LAN, and run only incremental > updates over a WAN. > > Configuring the delay between full backups must be possible too. > > Bye,
FYI, I've prepared a git branch that includes an improved version of my previous patch, and this time with the helper script. It adds a new option "increments" that my get a number of days before a new full backup will be done (by default 30), but which can also be set to "keep" to not activate this option and keep do incremental backups. I hope it's OK, and ready to be merged in for backupninja 0.9.8. More details at : http://git.debian.org/?p=users/olberger-guest/backupninja.git;a=summary (commit abf7a4bb651c5ec85306fca96a572dfc8a424edb) Best regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
