Le Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:47:02 -0400, Joey Hess <jo...@debian.org> a écrit :
> Yann Dirson wrote: > > Also, I infer that in 0.31 there was another mechanism in use, which > > supported localized timestamps (strptime ?). Maybe it can be > > reintroduced as a fallback when Date::Parse fails ? > > No, code has not changed since 0.31. My bad, it did not really work with 0.31 - reformatting to %H%M%S always yields "010000" regardless of actual timestamp. That may be related to the "uninitialized value" exceptions. Indeed 0.31 also rewrite file dates in a "ls -l|ts" stream, which is also quite unexpected. So 0.39 is actually better than 0.31 :) What about the idea of falling back to strptime ? -- Yann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
