Raphael Geissert <geiss...@debian.org> writes: > One possible solution I can think about is to ignore/bypass the > package-uses-local-diversion check for now and later handle the issue > when bash is the one that has to divert /bin/sh.
I think it would be reasonable to just bail if a local diversion is set with some sort of message saying that nothing is being done. That message could be missed and people would then be confused about what's going on, but my personal initial feeling is that that's slightly better than removing the local diversion. It all feels very thinly balanced to me, though. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
