Like the reporters of #531002 and #557209 I was seeing apticron continually 
reporting that the dash and diffutils packages needed to be upgraded. I 
figured out what is going on:

1) The systems seeing this also have unstable listed in sources.list but 
have it pinned to a low priority.
2) diffutils and dash are "Priority: required"/"Essential: yes" in 
unstable, but weren't in lenny.
3) apt-get dist-upgrade thinks they should be pulled in (aptitude 
dist-upgrade ignores them)

This appears to be the same as #544481.

For apticron: can this be worked around or maybe just document ways the 
user can prevent it from happening?

For apt-get:
I suppose this could be seen as either a bug or feature, if the latter then 
please leave open and tag wontfix (and make aptitude consistent). 
Regardless of the default, it might be nice to have a command-line switch 
that controls the behavior so that things like apticron could specify what 
they want.

-- 
Matt Taggart
tagg...@debian.org





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to