You are right. My plans for next release are to rename the rosegarden4 package as rosegarden, and create a new dummy package rosegarden4 that will depend on the new package "rosegarden".
Thanks. Enrique. On 8/9/05, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: rosegarden > Version: 2.1pl4-2 > Priority: wishlist > > This dummy package is present in sarge, etch and sid. > As this is a dummy transition-only package (for woody), is there > a reason why this package should still exist in the distribution? > Notice that we currently only support upgrade paths from stable > (currently sarge) to "new stable" (currently etch) and in both > these distributions this package is a dummy package. For more > information read the Release Notes [1]. > > If this package is no longer required, please ask for its removal by > reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org or remove the package from > your control file in your next upload. > > Also please reassign its 7 bugs, if appropiate, to the package that > replaces it. > > Regards > > Javier > > [1] > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading#s-system-status > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFC9+ExsandgtyBSwkRAmfDAJ0Yw2HtU9KFFO22UYtOhqb0FgkodgCdHs+y > byX7aIL49ilqpJGPjwrIkuw= > =uB6Q > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >
