On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:15:55AM +0200, David Paleino wrote: > Hello people, > trying to finally solve #571929, "circular dependency hell", I decided it was > better to diverge from upstream/Ubuntu packaging. > > The last mail is from Raphael, on March 26, and upstream people (Chad, Ken, > again CCed) never replied. > > Maybe we could call the new package something different from > python-desktopcouch-extra, but I think this is a minor issue. An option could > be providing many small packages (but I'd say this is a bit overkill -- and > should probably go in another bugreport). Let's say: > - python-desktopcouch-contacts > - python-desktopcouch-notes > - python-desktopcouch-replication-services > - ... (they already added "bookmarks" in bzr, and I suppose others may > appear in future) > and maybe a "python-desktopcouch-all" meta-package. > > Do you have any objections to the aforementioned commits, and any comment > on the multi-package idea?
Hello David, for my part I do not use desktopcouch and did this bugreport based on dependency analysis only. I think this package should be split along server/client lines: python-desktopcouch-server python-desktopcouch-client python-desktopcouch-common python-desktopcouch-client-extra Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
