Hi Lionel,
On So, 25 Apr 2010, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> No, I didn't recently purge tetex-base. The operation was done was
> (among many other upgrades, filtering for things with "tex" in the
> name, removing things where the only match for "tex" was in the word
> "text". In particular, nothing there with "tetex" in the name):
Strange ...
> Now texlive-binaries doesn't configure, with the same symptoms.
What I don't understand why tex-common wasn'tconfigured. Can you
check that it is:
dpkg -l tex-common texlive-base
and send the output.
Best wishes
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining prein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TU Wien, Austria Debian TeX Task Force
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IPSWICH (n.)
The sound at the other end of the telephone which tells you that the
automatic exchange is working very hard but is intending not actually
to connect you this time, merely to let you know how difficult it is.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
