Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 16:33 +0200, Fabian Greffrath a écrit : > Am 16.04.2010 16:08, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: > > I can provide you a compromise here. > > Beside the current packages, I can try to do a package called > > libatlas3gf-all > > which will contain all the various optimisation. The ld stuff would be > > done in this package. > > Well, this will add another package to the current list of alternative > dependencies for libblas3gf, which is IMHO too long already and a > reason why I filed this bug report in the first place. By the way, since it has been this way for a decade, would you mind if I lower the importance of this bug ?
> How are you going to do the "ld stuff" ni this package? Will you add > symlinks from e.g. from /usr/lib/atlas-sse2 to /usr/lib/sse2? Sorry but I don't know yet. > > Beside the refactoring and the new upstream release, what I did was to > > replace the "LD_LIBRARY_PATH way" by update-alternatives. > > Understood now, thanks. ;) > > - Fabian > > PS: BTW, is it possible that the directory structure that I just > suggested was already present in the Lenny versions of the packages? No, I worked had on keeping the same structure and libraries naming in this refactoring. Thanks Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
