John Lindgren wrote: > John Goerzen wrote: >> After the upgrade from audacious 2.0.1 to 2.1, I started seeing this. >> This did not happen at the same time as a kernel upgrade, so I feel >> fairly justified in seeing this bug filed against audacious. > > Started seeing what? Please elaborate. >
Very, very high CPU usage. > If you mean that you are using a high-quality resampling method, then > you can expect Audacious to consume a lot of CPU. No, not doing that. > > Likewise, if you mean that you started seeing the Audacious process take > 15-30% of CPU time in system calls when outputting through DMix, but not > when outputting to hardware directly, then I can confirm, both on an > Intel ICH6 and an HDA. But that is a problem with DMix, not Audacious. Not using DMix either -- hardware direct. Hardware is Intel HDA, but earlier Audacious had no trouble with it. > > Peace, > John Lindgren > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
