Doing a "view source" on the messages also fails.
A couple of sample messages that failed to display until I restarted
icedove are attached.
Notable are the large size of the headers of the messages, although as
many of the newsgroups I read with icedove are mailing lists carried on
gmane.org, headers of this size would not be uncommon.
Arthur.
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
Message-ID:
<20100410133816.6256.49215.reportbug__46071.3245011449$1270908012$gmane$...@belanna.comodo.priv.at>
From: gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.release
Subject: Bug#577209: nmu: Please schedule binNMUs against libdbi-perl
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:38:16 +0200
Lines: 55
Approved: n...@gmane.org
Reply-To: gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org>, 577...@bugs.debian.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270908012 5772 80.91.229.12 (10 Apr 2010 14:00:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: use...@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:00:12 +0000 (UTC)
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>
Original-X-From:
bounce-debian-release=debian-release=m.gmane....@lists.debian.org Sat Apr 10
16:00:11 2010
Return-path: <bounce-debian-release=debian-release=m.gmane....@lists.debian.org>
Envelope-to: debian-rele...@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from liszt.debian.org ([82.195.75.100])
by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from
<bounce-debian-release=debian-release=m.gmane....@lists.debian.org>)
id 1O0bEI-0004Zs-Sn
for debian-rele...@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:00:10 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id 592552D1EE5; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:00:10 +0000 (UTC)
Old-Return-Path: <debb...@busoni.debian.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on liszt.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,
IMPRONONCABLE_1,IMPRONONCABLE_2,LDO_WHITELIST,MONEY,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD1,
MURPHY_WRONG_WORD2,PGPSIGNATURE,STOCKLIKE autolearn=failed version=3.2.5
X-Original-To: lists-debian-rele...@liszt.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-rele...@liszt.debian.org
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A52313A6612
for <lists-debian-rele...@liszt.debian.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:42:20
+0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.08 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD=0.02,
IMPRONONCABLE_1=1, IMPRONONCABLE_2=1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MONEY=0.5,
MURPHY_WRONG_WORD1=0.1, MURPHY_WRONG_WORD2=0.2, PGPSIGNATURE=-5,
STOCKLIKE=1] autolearn=ham
Original-Received: from liszt.debian.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525)
with ESMTP id d5MHMGYON6cW
for <lists-debian-rele...@liszt.debian.org>;
Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:42:11 +0000 (UTC)
Original-Received: from busoni.debian.org (busoni.debian.org [140.211.15.34])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 692D413A6208;
Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:42:11 +0000 (UTC)
Original-Received: from debbugs by busoni.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <debb...@busoni.debian.org>)
id 1O0awq-0001wk-1V; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:42:08 +0000
X-Loop: ow...@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: debian-p...@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team
<debian-rele...@lists.debian.org>
X-Loop: ow...@bugs.debian.org
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:42:04 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.577209.b.12709067074...@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 577209
X-Debian-PR-Package: release.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
Original-Received: via spool by sub...@bugs.debian.org id=B.12709067074294
(code B ref -1); Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:42:04 +0000
Original-Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2010 13:38:27 +0000
Original-Received: from colleen.colgarra.priv.at ([82.150.197.85])
by busoni.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <gre...@debian.org>)
id 1O0atG-00015x-Vy
for sub...@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:38:27 +0000
Original-Received: from chello212186032184.406.14.vie.surfer.at
([212.186.32.184] helo=belanna.comodo.priv.at)
by colleen.colgarra.priv.at with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <gre...@debian.org>)
id 1O0at7-0006mM-0T
for sub...@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:38:17 +0200
Original-Received: from gregoa by belanna.comodo.priv.at with local (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <gre...@debian.org>)
id 1O0at6-0003ck-6m
for sub...@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:38:16 +0200
X-Mailer: reportbug 4.11
Delivered-To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:42:08 +0000
X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
X-Mailing-List: <debian-rele...@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/35323
X-Loop: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-release.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-rele...@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<mailto:debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.release/34147>
Xref: ppp121-45-136-118.lns11.adl6.internode.on.net
gmane.linux.debian.devel.release:853
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
It looks like the arch:any packages build-depending on libdbi-perl
need binNMUs against the new libdbi-perl 1.610.90-1.
Please note that libdbd-mysql-perl already saw a sourceful upload;
I've now locally verified that libdbd-sqlite3-perl errors out and
works after a rebuild.
If my grep-dctrl foo worked this should be:
nmu libdbd-odbc-perl_1.23-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu libdbd-sqlite2-perl_2:0.33-8 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu libdbd-sqlite3-perl_1.29-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu libdbd-sybase-perl_1.00-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu libdbix-oo-perl_0.0.9-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu libpoe-component-dbiagent-perl_0.26-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new
libdbi-perl."
nmu libtfbs-perl_0.5.svn.20091128-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new
libdbi-perl."
nmu olive_1.3-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu sympa_5.4.7-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
Cheers,
gregor, who hopes he got his first binNMU request right
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=R2TB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <20100413161221.ga26...@perso.beuc.net>
From: Sylvain Beucler <b...@beuc.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.release
Subject: tla update for Debian 5.0.5
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:12:21 +0200
Lines: 174
Approved: n...@gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5"
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271175169 6359 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2010 16:12:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: use...@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:12:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: b...@decadent.ork.uk
To: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Original-X-From:
bounce-debian-release=debian-release=m.gmane....@lists.debian.org Tue Apr 13
18:12:47 2010
Return-path: <bounce-debian-release=debian-release=m.gmane....@lists.debian.org>
Envelope-to: debian-rele...@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from liszt.debian.org ([82.195.75.100])
by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from
<bounce-debian-release=debian-release=m.gmane....@lists.debian.org>)
id 1O1ijE-0005gf-If
for debian-rele...@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:12:44 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id 194BE13A581E; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:12:44 +0000 (UTC)
Old-Return-Path: <b...@beuc.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on liszt.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,
LDO_WHITELIST,MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8,PGPSIGNATURE autolearn=failed
version=3.2.5
X-Original-To: lists-debian-rele...@liszt.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-rele...@liszt.debian.org
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDD013A57FD
for <lists-debian-rele...@liszt.debian.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:12:38
+0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.96 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD=0.02, LDO_WHITELIST=-5,
MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham
Original-Received: from liszt.debian.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525)
with ESMTP id GPX26pwzUuMf
for <lists-debian-rele...@liszt.debian.org>;
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:12:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-policyd-weight: DYN_NJABL=SKIP(0) NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5
NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 DSBL_ORG=SKIP(0) CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .beuc. -
helo: .smtp1-g21.free. - helo-domain: .free.)
FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -5
Original-Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.1])
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC8213A5578
for <debian-rele...@lists.debian.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:12:29 +0000
(UTC)
Original-Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DCB940159
for <debian-rele...@lists.debian.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:12:24 +0200
(CEST)
Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [82.238.35.175])
by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8389401ED
for <debian-rele...@lists.debian.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:12:22 +0200
(CEST)
Original-Received: from me by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <b...@beuc.net>)
id 1O1iir-0004in-Pr; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:12:21 +0200
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
Resent-Message-ID: <due6unumkef.a.1bb.8fj...@liszt>
Resent-From: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-rele...@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/35355
X-Loop: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-release.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-rele...@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<mailto:debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:12:44 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.release/34179>
Xref: ppp121-45-136-118.lns11.adl6.internode.on.net
gmane.linux.debian.devel.release:885
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello stable release managers,
I would like to upload a security update for Lenny, for package 'tla'.
http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1953
As it's a minor issue, the security team asked me to upload it through
a point-release update (cf. forwarded message below).
A package can be found at:
http://www.beuc.net/tmp/tla/lenny-stable/tla_1.3.5+dfsg-14+lenny1.dsc
Is it OK with you?
Here's the interdiff:
diff -u tla-1.3.5+dfsg/debian/changelog tla-1.3.5+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- tla-1.3.5+dfsg/debian/changelog
+++ tla-1.3.5+dfsg/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+tla (1.3.5+dfsg-14+lenny1) stable; urgency=3Dlow
+
+ * QA upload.
+ * Fix CVE-2009-3560 and CVE-2009-3720 denial-of-services by patching
+ bundled libexpat (closes: #560940).
+
+ -- Sylvain Beucler <b...@beuc.net> Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:55:51 +0200
+
tla (1.3.5+dfsg-14) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
=20
* QA upload.
diff -u tla-1.3.5+dfsg/debian/patches/00list tla-1.3.5+dfsg/debian/patches/=
00list
--- tla-1.3.5+dfsg/debian/patches/00list
+++ tla-1.3.5+dfsg/debian/patches/00list
@@ -5,0 +6,2 @@
+CVE-2009-3560.dpatch
+CVE-2009-3720.dpatch
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tla-1.3.5+dfsg.orig/debian/patches/CVE-2009-3720.dpatch
+++ tla-1.3.5+dfsg/debian/patches/CVE-2009-3720.dpatch
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
+## CVE-2009-3720.dpatch by Sylvain Beucler <b...@beuc.net>
+##
+## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
+## DP: Fix CVE-2009-3720 vulnerability
+## DP: Check:
+## DP: http://expat.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/expat/expat/lib/xmltok_impl=
=2Ec?r1=3D1.13&r2=3D1.15&diff_format=3Dl
+## DP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D560940
+
+...@dpatch@
+diff -urNad tla-1.3.5+dfsg~/src/expat/lib/xmltok_impl.c tla-1.3.5+dfsg/src=
/expat/lib/xmltok_impl.c
+--- tla-1.3.5+dfsg~/src/expat/lib/xmltok_impl.c 2006-07-20
08:34:33.000000=
000 +0200
++++ tla-1.3.5+dfsg/src/expat/lib/xmltok_impl.c 2010-01-23 19:35:20.0000000=
00 +0100
+@@ -1741,7 +1741,7 @@
+ const char *end,
+ POSITION *pos)
+ {
+- while (ptr !=3D end) {
++ while (ptr < end) {
+ switch (BYTE_TYPE(enc, ptr)) {
+ #define LEAD_CASE(n) \
+ case BT_LEAD ## n: \
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tla-1.3.5+dfsg.orig/debian/patches/CVE-2009-3560.dpatch
+++ tla-1.3.5+dfsg/debian/patches/CVE-2009-3560.dpatch
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
+## CVE-2009-3560.dpatch by Sylvain Beucler <b...@beuc.net>
+##
+## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
+## DP: Fix CVE-2009-3560 vulnerability
+## DP: Check:
+## DP: http://expat.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/expat/expat/lib/xmlparse.c?=
r1=3D1.164&r2=3D1.166&diff_format=3Dh
+## DP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D560940
+
+...@dpatch@
+diff -urNad tla-1.3.5+dfsg~/src/expat/lib/xmlparse.c tla-1.3.5+dfsg/src/ex=
pat/lib/xmlparse.c
+--- tla-1.3.5+dfsg~/src/expat/lib/xmlparse.c 2006-07-20 08:34:33.000000000=
+0200
++++ tla-1.3.5+dfsg/src/expat/lib/xmlparse.c 2010-01-23 19:32:26.000000000 =
+0100
+@@ -3615,6 +3615,9 @@
+ return XML_ERROR_UNCLOSED_TOKEN;
+ case XML_TOK_PARTIAL_CHAR:
+ return XML_ERROR_PARTIAL_CHAR;
++ case -XML_TOK_PROLOG_S:
++ tok =3D -tok;
++ break;
+ case XML_TOK_NONE:
+ #ifdef XML_DTD
+ /* for internal PE NOT referenced between declarations */
Best regards,
- Sylvain
----- Forwarded message from Moritz Muehlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> -----
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:56:22 +0100
=46rom: Moritz Muehlenhoff <j...@inutil.org>
To: Sylvain Beucler <b...@beuc.net>
Cc: t...@security.debian.org, b...@decadent.org.uk
Subject: Re: Versioning: security updates and binary uploads
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 02:19:13PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Ciao!
>=20
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 01:21:55PM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> > Il 21/03/2010 14:16, Sylvain Beucler ha scritto:
> > > There's no conflict right now, because 'b' '<' 'etch', but there would
> > > be a conflict if 'etch' had been called instead 'alfred' or anything
> > > that is '<' 'b'.
> > >=20
> > > So maybe I should use:
> > > -> tla-1.3.5+dfsg-9+b1+etch1
> > > as a rule?
> >=20
> > As you wrote, there is no conflict right now, so you should use
> > tla-1.3.5+dfsg-9+etch1.
>=20
> Ok, thanks.
> =20
> > BTW, currently there isn't any security issues opened for tla, what are
> > you preparing?
>=20
> tla includes a copy of libexpat, so it's affected by:
> http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1953
> A fix was uploaded to testing, but not to stable and old-stable.
This specific issue doesn't warrant a DSA, please update it through a stable
point update:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-stable
=20
> Btw, do you still accept old-stable uploads?
Support for Etch has ended some weeks ago.
Cheers,
Moritz
----- End forwarded message -----
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkvEl+UACgkQcllesYFwS5OMhgCfRCJnP1LSVEQ7p2sj9vyKpvx1
W2UAoM1bmkbCrAbpMIrlsKxnjLaKSY5a
=oi0+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--
