On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 15:09:56 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 13/04/10 at 14:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 13:43:26 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > > So, there's no perfect solution, and I think that the current one > > > (assume that there's no common user of music player daemon and mpich2) > > > is the best compromise. > > > > I disagree that sweeping a serious policy violation under the carpet > > (and preventing co-installation of mpd and mpich in the process) can be > > qualified with 'best' anything. > > So what do you propose?
Talk to the other package maintainer (and possibly upstreams). Rename one or both binaries. (Yes, I know it's a pain. That doesn't make a Conflicts right.) Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
