clone 576944 -1 reassign -1 g++ tag 576944 + pending thanks On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 05:22:45PM +0200, Luca Niccoli wrote: > I've recently submitted bug #576944 and could use some help to trace > it down better, and understand if it's really a bug. > Some more things I've noticed: > If I set /proc/cpu/alignment to 0 (ignore) or 3 (fixup+warn) I see > three alignment traps each time _xapian.so is loaded (with > update-apt-xapian-index or axi-cache); if I set it to 1 (warn), I see > more than 50 of them. > I don't understand why this should happen. > I can either fixup or ignore the traps, both update-apt-xapian-index > and axi-cache seem to work - and the databases in > /var/lib/apt-xapian-index don't show sign of corruption. > If I add -g to g++ flags, the two unaligned relocation entries > disappear (they don't just get aligned) > Is this actually a bug? > If it is, whose bug is it?
John Reiser says "g++" in a reply not cc:-ed to the bug: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.ports.arm/8422/focus=8424 I think he's right, so cloning the bug and assigning the copy to g++. I'm OK with adding "-g" to xapian-bindings' debian/rules as a workaround, so keeping 576944 to track that (have committed this change, will include in 1.0.19-1). Cheers, Olly -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
