On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 17:18, Christoph Burgmer <cburg...@ira.uka.de> wrote:
> Sandro,
>
> Am Freitag, 9. April 2010 schrieb Sandro Tosi:
>> Compatibility bugs for 2.4 are no longer valid (but I'm not closing it
>> since i'm neither the pacakge maitainer nor the original reporter).
>
> Thanks for the info. I know that 2.4 is not supported anymore, but as Debian
> has no way of removing once shipped packages I assumed there's at least a way
> to keep newer updates respecting left-over packages.

No, there's none. Also, if you had updated python-minimal, you would
not have 2.4 in the supported versions list anymore.

> I might be wrong but
> something along the line of adding a Conflict: python2.4 would add minimum
> compatibility.

No, that's wrong, an hopefully no-one will do. every
modules/extensions has to conflic with 2.4 "just in case"? the main
python package? transitions are not done this way.

> It's not really a bug so you can probably ignore this after all.
>
> Oh, and keeping 2.4 does serve a purpose for testing compliance of own
> packages. :)

That's sure, but if you decide to have an unsupported package for your
own purposes, then probably reporting bugs about it is not that
correct ;)

Regards,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to