also sprach Philipp Weis <pw...@pweis.com> [2010.04.06.1943 +0200]:
> * Replacing your script with the new minimal wrapper will not change
>   this script behaves at all. Mutt does all the mailto URL parsing
>   that your script used to do -- no functionality will be lost.

But didn't you say that mutt mailto cannot handle arbitrary headers,
like my script can?

> * Probably with the next upstream of mutt, mailto URLs will be handled
>   differently by mutt itself. Only subject and body attributes will be
>   honord by default, everything else needs to be specifically allowed
>   by the user in their mutt configuration. This should be mentioned in
>   the changelog and the mutt documentation, but I don't think it
>   really needs to be advertised beyond that.

Yes, agreed.

> The combination of these two points does break the current
> behavior in that exotic header attributes will no longer work out
> of the box. What do you think would be the right way to alert the
> user about this, and is this even necessary?

At the very least, there should be a NEWS entry. I also think that
it makes sense to have the wrapper output a warning (e.g. cat the
NEWS stanza) to stdout, nudging the user to stop using the wrapper.
That'll be a self-fulfilling profecy.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madd...@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"the only difference between the saint and the sinner
 is that every saint has a past and every sinner has a future."
                                                        -- oscar wilde

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)

Reply via email to