On 05/04/10 at 17:39 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> writes: > > I initially planned to track the ruby1.9 -> ruby1.9.1 transition. But I > > give up. I think that ruby1.9 should be removed from testing now, > > together with the following list of packages (which are all the reverse > > build-deps or depends of ruby1.9): > > I ended up with the following hint: > remove capistrano/2.5.5-1 erubis/2.6.2-3 htree/0.7-3 libabstract-ruby/1.0.0-2 > libdifflcs-ruby/1.1.2-3 libgruff-ruby/0.3.6-2 libmecab-ruby/0.98-3 > libnet-scp-ruby/1.0.2-1 libnet-sftp2-ruby/2.0.2-1 libnet-ssh2-ruby/2.0.13-1 > libnet-ssh-gateway-ruby/1.0.1-1 libprawn-ruby/0.7.1+dfsg-1 > librspec-ruby/1.2.9-1 libstomp-ruby/1.0.4-1 merb/1.0.12+dfsg-3 > ohcount/3.0.0-2 samidare/0.7-1 wfo/0.1-2 > > I did not yet add it, as it contains a few packages you didn't list: > capistrano librspec-ruby merb ohcount samidare wfo > > I arrived at that list by repeated dak rm -Rns testing @packages runs, > starting with @packages = (ruby1.9) and then adding all broken packages > to @packages until reaching a fixpoint. This means I also considered > broken build-depends. > > Do you still want to get all of these packages removed?
Yes please. I hope that they will be fixed before the release, but having a clean state in testing (without ruby1.9) now is better. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
