On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:56, d...@fifthhorseman.net said: > interesting. i didn't find that when i did my original searching. > could you point me to the URL?
http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~biham/Reports/Tiger/ > I don't know who or what Ross is, or how it fits into this discussion, > sorry. Ross Anderson and Adi Shamir developed Tiger. My point is: The name and algorithm ID we use in Libgcrypt for Tiger is more or less arbitrary and not well defined. Thus we could keep that even if the algorithm does not anymore reflect the the actual description. However, the OID is a well defined description for the algorithm and should reflect reality. > wonder how much time it's worth spending on it :/ Disabling the digest > by default would certainly be the quickest way to find out who really > needs it, though it could get ugly. Yeah, if you do that in the Debian distributed stable version. I propose a different stratey: We drop the OID, add a correct TIGER implementaion and as an extra benefit implement TIGER2. This is a minor change to the current code and in particular it doesn't increase the size of the lib. Regarding TIGER2 I need to talk with Ross Anderson whether we should assign an OID to it. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
