reopen 481068
thanks

Heya,

Václav Ovsík wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:40:37PM -0700, Chris Taylor wrote:
>> close 481068
>> thanks
>>
>> It works for me, and after nearly 2 weeks without a response from the
> 
> Sorry, I didn't receive the previous update. BTS is not sending to
> submitter by itself AFAIK and I was not subscribed to bug explicitly...

Sorry about that, I will be sure to CC you from now on.

>> bug submitter I am going to close this bug. If this is in error feel
>> free to re-open it and provide more information.
> 
> OK. I try reproduce the problem without confusing ssh call this time:
> 
> On the Etch:
> 
> z...@nagios:~$ socat -V|head -2
> socat by Gerhard Rieger - see www.dest-unreach.org
> socat version 1.4.3.1 on Apr 13 2006 15:56:26
> z...@nagios:~$ socat SYSTEM:'printf "%b" "1\n2\n3\n"' STDOUT
> 1
> 2
> 3

Definitely the output that would be expected.

> z...@nagios:~$
> 
> On the Sid:
> 
> z...@bobek:~$ socat -V|head -2
> socat by Gerhard Rieger - see www.dest-unreach.org
> socat version 1.7.1.2 on Feb 11 2010 19:13:27
> z...@bobek:~$ socat SYSTEM:'printf "%b" "1\n2\n3\n"' STDOUT
> 1sh: line 1: 2: command not found
> sh: line 2: 3: command not found

Hmm, that doesn't seem like the right thing.

> I think the problem still exists...

I agree, I believe that it does. I will try to look into this more as
soon as I have time.


Thanks,
Chris



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to