On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:42:31 +0100, Xan wrote: > In official changelog http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd/#releasenotes > there is no notice about it. Where is the source of this change?
The patch you yourself supplied is included in the Debian source package as debian/patches/10-x-forwarded-for-header.dpatch (with very minor modifications; and alas, with no description. It should probably be fixed to indicate the origins of the patch and a pointer to this bug). It is unclear to me how this is supposed to fix the problem which this bug report was originally about, though. How does this help POST content get through? (Please be gentle; I might be ignorant of something obvious.) The Changelog says "X-Forwarded-Via" while the patch has "X-Forwarded-For:" -- I presume the latter is correct, also as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-Forwarded-For, and that the Changelog should be corrected. But again, it seems doubtful to me how this helps solve bug #119888 which is about correctly receiving POST content. (The comment by Nikita Borisov from 2003 alleges that this POST problem was fixed in 2.22 although there is no explicit mention of this in the upstream changelog, either.) /* era */ -- If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
